Tools › SmartFormular E-Rechnung lite › Validation rules › BR-DE-21
BR-DE-21
The specification identifier (BT-24) is not the XRechnung identifier
What the message means
The specification identifier (BT-24) is not the XRechnung identifier.
What the issuer needs to change
Use urn:cen.eu:en16931:2017#compliant#urn:xeinkauf.de:kosit:xrechnung_3.0.
Fields concerned
BT-24specification identifier
Your invoice reports BR-DE-21? Check it with SmartFormular E-Rechnung lite, free to try until 31 December 2026: the tool shows every finding with an explanation, the invoice in readable form and a GiroCode to pay – in your browser, no upload.
Check an e-invoiceOrigin
- Rule set
- XRechnung 3.0.2 (KoSIT, Schematron 2.6.0)
- Syntax
- CII, UBL
- Level
- Warning
Original rule text
Das Element "Specification identifier" (BT-24) soll syntaktisch der Kennung des Standards XRechnung entsprechen.
Technical details for IT
UBL
Context: /ubl:Invoice | /cn:CreditNote Test: not(cbc:CustomizationID = $XR-CIUS-ID or cbc:CustomizationID = $XR-EXTENSION-ID or cbc:CustomizationID = $XR-CVD-ID)
CII
Context: /rsm:CrossIndustryInvoice/rsm:ExchangedDocumentContext Test: not(ram:GuidelineSpecifiedDocumentContextParameter/ram:ID = $XR-CIUS-ID or ram:GuidelineSpecifiedDocumentContextParameter/ram:ID = $XR-EXTENSION-ID or ram:GuidelineSpecifiedDocumentContextParameter/ram:ID = $XR-CVD-ID)
Related rules
- BR-DE-18The early-payment discount in the payment terms (BT-20) is not in the required form
- BR-DE-19The IBAN given (BT-84) is not valid
- BR-DE-20The IBAN of the debited account (BT-91) is not valid
- BR-DE-22Two attachments have the same file name
- BR-DE-23-aCredit transfer is given as payment means, but without account details (BG-17)
- BR-DE-23-bWith credit transfer, card or direct debit details are also given