Tools › SmartFormular E-Rechnung lite › Validation rules › BR-DE-30
BR-DE-30
Missing for the direct debit: bank assigned creditor identifier (BT-90)
What the message means
Missing for the direct debit: bank assigned creditor identifier (BT-90).
What the issuer needs to change
Add the bank assigned creditor identifier.
Fields concerned
BG-19direct debitBT-90bank assigned creditor identifier
Your invoice reports BR-DE-30? Check it with SmartFormular E-Rechnung lite, free to try until 31 December 2026: the tool shows every finding with an explanation, the invoice in readable form and a GiroCode to pay – in your browser, no upload.
Check an e-invoiceOrigin
- Rule set
- XRechnung 3.0.2 (KoSIT, Schematron 2.6.0)
- Syntax
- CII, UBL
- Level
- Error
Original rule text
Wenn "DIRECT DEBIT" BG-19 vorhanden ist, dann muss "Bank assigned creditor identifier" BT-90 übermittelt werden.
Technical details for IT
UBL
Context: /ubl:Invoice | /cn:CreditNote Test: not(not(cac:PaymentMeans/cac:PaymentMandate) or (cac:AccountingSupplierParty/cac:Party/cac:PartyIdentification/cbc:ID[@schemeID='SEPA'] | cac:PayeeParty/cac:PartyIdentification/cbc:ID[@schemeID='SEPA']))
CII
Context: /rsm:CrossIndustryInvoice Test: not((($BT-89-path or $BT-91-path) and $BT-90-path) or $BG-19-not-existing)
Related rules
- BR-DE-26A corrected invoice (code 384) does not name the original invoice (BG-3)
- BR-DE-27The contact telephone number (BT-42) is missing or has fewer than three digits
- BR-DE-28The contact email address (BT-43) is missing or looks invalid
- BR-DE-31Missing for the direct debit: debited account identifier (BT-91)
- BR-DE-TMP-32The invoice gives no actual delivery date (BT-72) and no invoicing period (BG-14 or BG-26 per line)
- BR-DEX-02A line net amount (BT-131) does not equal the sum of its sub-lines