Tools › SmartFormular E-Rechnung lite › Validation rules › BR-DE-31
BR-DE-31
Missing for the direct debit: debited account identifier (BT-91)
What the message means
Missing for the direct debit: debited account identifier (BT-91).
What the issuer needs to change
Add the debited account identifier.
Fields concerned
BG-19direct debitBT-91debited account identifier
Your invoice reports BR-DE-31? Check it with SmartFormular E-Rechnung lite, free to try until 31 December 2026: the tool shows every finding with an explanation, the invoice in readable form and a GiroCode to pay – in your browser, no upload.
Check an e-invoiceOrigin
- Rule set
- XRechnung 3.0.2 (KoSIT, Schematron 2.6.0)
- Syntax
- CII, UBL
- Level
- Error
Original rule text
Wenn "DIRECT DEBIT" BG-19 vorhanden ist, dann muss "Debited account identifier" BT-91 übermittelt werden.
Technical details for IT
UBL
Context: /ubl:Invoice | /cn:CreditNote Test: not(not(cac:PaymentMeans/cac:PaymentMandate) or (cac:PaymentMeans/cac:PaymentMandate/cac:PayerFinancialAccount/cbc:ID))
CII
Context: /rsm:CrossIndustryInvoice Test: not((($BT-89-path or $BT-90-path) and $BT-91-path) or $BG-19-not-existing)
Related rules
- BR-DE-27The contact telephone number (BT-42) is missing or has fewer than three digits
- BR-DE-28The contact email address (BT-43) is missing or looks invalid
- BR-DE-30Missing for the direct debit: bank assigned creditor identifier (BT-90)
- BR-DE-TMP-32The invoice gives no actual delivery date (BT-72) and no invoicing period (BG-14 or BG-26 per line)
- BR-DEX-02A line net amount (BT-131) does not equal the sum of its sub-lines
- BR-DEX-03A sub-line (BG-DEX-01) does not have exactly one VAT entry (BG-DEX-06)